<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Let&#8217;s send some marketers to a treeless planet.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ericweaver.com/2007/12/lets-send-some-marketers-to-a-treeless-planet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ericweaver.com/2007/12/lets-send-some-marketers-to-a-treeless-planet/</link>
	<description>a 15-year experiment in storytelling</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 18:58:30 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Byers</title>
		<link>http://www.ericweaver.com/2007/12/lets-send-some-marketers-to-a-treeless-planet/comment-page-1/#comment-72</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Byers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 08:12:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.branddialogue.com/diablogue/?p=116#comment-72</guid>
		<description>I love this post.

Direct mail that wastes time, money and resources is irresponsible.

Does it make sense from an ROI standpoint? Sometimes, yes.

Has my firm done it? Yes (see above for the reason why)

But the bar is being raised.

Marketing should absolutely be socially and environmentally responsible. But it also must be responsible from strategy to execution, it must respect its audiences and it must provide some ROI.

There are ways to make direct mail more responsible (offer opt-out on every piece; target lists better, etc.), but sometimes the most responsible form of direct marketing is to not do it at all.

Keep up the great work.

Patrick Byers
The Responsible Marketing Blog
http://responsiblemarketing.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love this post.</p>
<p>Direct mail that wastes time, money and resources is irresponsible.</p>
<p>Does it make sense from an ROI standpoint? Sometimes, yes.</p>
<p>Has my firm done it? Yes (see above for the reason why)</p>
<p>But the bar is being raised.</p>
<p>Marketing should absolutely be socially and environmentally responsible. But it also must be responsible from strategy to execution, it must respect its audiences and it must provide some ROI.</p>
<p>There are ways to make direct mail more responsible (offer opt-out on every piece; target lists better, etc.), but sometimes the most responsible form of direct marketing is to not do it at all.</p>
<p>Keep up the great work.</p>
<p>Patrick Byers<br />
The Responsible Marketing Blog<br />
<a href="http://responsiblemarketing.com" rel="nofollow">http://responsiblemarketing.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
